Why I do not go barefoot in the city
In the city I go for shopping or for a faster way to do something. In both cases, I'm not paying attention "in the here and now", but distracted and / or hectic. Barefoot and know what lying around on broken glass, dog poo, chewing gum residues, waste oil and tar in our cities. I also find it disgusting when people spit on the floor.
I say that our cities would be nicer places if they would have to measure itself against the criterion of barefoot fitness.
a utopia? Yes, sure. But not the worst. could be
Monday, June 27, 2005
Wednesday, June 22, 2005
Do A Lot Of Moles Make A Person Ugly?
feel good = Sex = fetishism?
The family-friendly definition of foot fetishism, "There are people for whom it is a great feeling to be touched by other people's feet, or look at pictures of feet of other people to watch."
first Question: What to do with barefoot foot fetishism?
first Answer: Absolutely nothing. As far as I know, it is aimed to fix the foot fetishist so not just on its own feet.
second Question: What has to walk barefoot in general with eroticism?
2.a Short answer: Absolutely nothing.
2.b Long answer: It depends on how woman / man erotic defined. Naturists or sauna users know that it is received rather unerotic because, although all run around naked, better said, because being naked is something completely as normal. Who was walking around barefoot for so long that it is normal, of course the whole question any more.
In the extremely prudish centuries it was for much of the rural poor generally normal to walk barefoot. Had there been a hint in the context erotic, the almighty church certainly would have become active, however.
other hand, I can confirm from personal experience that it's a barefoot walk in the woods many "great emotion" given them, and if you eg cool moss, over sun-warmed logs or going through boggy sections of the forest path. I cherish the deepest sorrow for the people who have never experienced something like that. If this "great feeling" to be equated with "erotic" - please. I call it a new dimension of perception, on a par with seeing, hearing, smelling.
And where "great feeling" ends and "erotic" begins, which should not hesitate any decision / s for themselves. But's not telling me, for I am not interested. I have long since ceased to me to worry about empty words his head.
M.
The family-friendly definition of foot fetishism, "There are people for whom it is a great feeling to be touched by other people's feet, or look at pictures of feet of other people to watch."
(Note how elegant this definition, the word fields "erotic, sexual fixation" and especially "depth psychology" circumnavigated. What Lucky you! Imagine, your kids would pick up such notions here, and then ask "Dad / Mom, what is real and deeper psychology '?")
first Question: What to do with barefoot foot fetishism?
first Answer: Absolutely nothing. As far as I know, it is aimed to fix the foot fetishist so not just on its own feet.
second Question: What has to walk barefoot in general with eroticism?
2.a Short answer: Absolutely nothing.
2.b Long answer: It depends on how woman / man erotic defined. Naturists or sauna users know that it is received rather unerotic because, although all run around naked, better said, because being naked is something completely as normal. Who was walking around barefoot for so long that it is normal, of course the whole question any more.
In the extremely prudish centuries it was for much of the rural poor generally normal to walk barefoot. Had there been a hint in the context erotic, the almighty church certainly would have become active, however.
other hand, I can confirm from personal experience that it's a barefoot walk in the woods many "great emotion" given them, and if you eg cool moss, over sun-warmed logs or going through boggy sections of the forest path. I cherish the deepest sorrow for the people who have never experienced something like that. If this "great feeling" to be equated with "erotic" - please. I call it a new dimension of perception, on a par with seeing, hearing, smelling.
And where "great feeling" ends and "erotic" begins, which should not hesitate any decision / s for themselves. But's not telling me, for I am not interested. I have long since ceased to me to worry about empty words his head.
M.
Thursday, June 16, 2005
Red Face After Eating Meal
shoe advertising
think how stupid for us to shoe manufacturers like when they try to convince us that the human foot is dependent on artificial support? In particular, manufacturers of sports shoes make us believe that running is harmful, if it does not happen in their disgustingly expensive products.
A few facts of human evolution: Homo sapiens is an animal of the savannah. As a biological species, we are long-distance runner. There are findings. There is no evidence that our tree-dwelling ancestors invented the shoes before they decide to transition to bipedal could. We are still barefoot endurance runner.
I do not know since when it boots (in the broadest sense) are, but in terms of evolution, they play no role. The wearing of shoes has to have no effect on our gene pool, because - considered phylogenetically - is too short a time before become fashionable.
If the shoe manufacturers argue that we "civilized" (oh, you shit) people but now once grew up with shoes, were therefore that our muscles, ligaments and bones so relaxed and our feet have become so sensitive that they - ontogenetically Viewed - now just need shoes, then I remember only one the analogy that we alcoholics should in future be administered instead of a cure even better, the daily dose of fuel, because they have become so used to it ...
It is very clear profit interests, which precludes walking barefoot. And since we live in a society that is in the profits of the ultimate yardstick for everything we have, I think, also just found a reason why barefoot is totally reasonable, and is still not practiced in a reasonable extent. (See in the article "realities created in the head")
M.
think how stupid for us to shoe manufacturers like when they try to convince us that the human foot is dependent on artificial support? In particular, manufacturers of sports shoes make us believe that running is harmful, if it does not happen in their disgustingly expensive products.
A few facts of human evolution: Homo sapiens is an animal of the savannah. As a biological species, we are long-distance runner. There are findings. There is no evidence that our tree-dwelling ancestors invented the shoes before they decide to transition to bipedal could. We are still barefoot endurance runner.
I do not know since when it boots (in the broadest sense) are, but in terms of evolution, they play no role. The wearing of shoes has to have no effect on our gene pool, because - considered phylogenetically - is too short a time before become fashionable.
If the shoe manufacturers argue that we "civilized" (oh, you shit) people but now once grew up with shoes, were therefore that our muscles, ligaments and bones so relaxed and our feet have become so sensitive that they - ontogenetically Viewed - now just need shoes, then I remember only one the analogy that we alcoholics should in future be administered instead of a cure even better, the daily dose of fuel, because they have become so used to it ...
It is very clear profit interests, which precludes walking barefoot. And since we live in a society that is in the profits of the ultimate yardstick for everything we have, I think, also just found a reason why barefoot is totally reasonable, and is still not practiced in a reasonable extent. (See in the article "realities created in the head")
M.
What Does The Cake Boss Use For Fondant
clear: barefoot running leads to bladder
childhood memory: The risk of bladder infection: The most important argument against the parental care was barefoot!
Once I acquired an approximate idea of the arrangement of the organs in the human body, I was skeptical because I more or less consciously thought about the following: first
Bare feet in summer to, say 15 - 20 ° C to cool (eg in the bath or at night).
second In cool winter snowball fights hands down to much lower values, as you all know that wearing gloves can form no reasonable snowballs and thus digging for hours with their bare hands in the snow.
third When bare feet out in the summer temperatures referred to a bladder infection, then bare hands must inevitably lead to much niedrigeneren temperatures to pneumonia because his hands so the lungs are closer than feet of the bladder.
(Now I know that the coldest part of the body is the nose and would have to with childlike naivete ask why not naked nose lead to meningitis.)
Because answered appropriate questions from the adult world with rather poor information at the time, I built me then a theory rightly, in addition to the veins and nerves in our legs would probably also give specific lines for transport of cold feet to the bladder. (This sounds like an anecdote, but true!)
I have now successfully completed a degree in biology and I am pretty sure that no such lines exist. Therefore, I have my child's hypothesis revised: bladder infections occur when the lower part of cooling down the torso. This happens eg for light clothing.
given an experiment
subject A runs nice and warm in winter and is making a long barefoot walk in the woods. (NOTE: Frostbite can use from +5 ° C, not just exaggerating!)
subject B makes the same walk with free lower body, but with moon boots on the feet.
result
subject A reported that it was toasty warm. The feet are (at least for a few minutes) with blood so fantastic that it really fun to play. For the rest of the day it does not need socks and shoes more because the heat in the feet lasts a long time.
subject B reported nothing, because we have not done this part of the experiment, especially for health and aesthetic reasons. But we have sufficient grounds to suspect that it would be B and not A which would have captured the cystitis.
M.
childhood memory: The risk of bladder infection: The most important argument against the parental care was barefoot!
Once I acquired an approximate idea of the arrangement of the organs in the human body, I was skeptical because I more or less consciously thought about the following: first
Bare feet in summer to, say 15 - 20 ° C to cool (eg in the bath or at night).
second In cool winter snowball fights hands down to much lower values, as you all know that wearing gloves can form no reasonable snowballs and thus digging for hours with their bare hands in the snow.
third When bare feet out in the summer temperatures referred to a bladder infection, then bare hands must inevitably lead to much niedrigeneren temperatures to pneumonia because his hands so the lungs are closer than feet of the bladder.
(Now I know that the coldest part of the body is the nose and would have to with childlike naivete ask why not naked nose lead to meningitis.)
Because answered appropriate questions from the adult world with rather poor information at the time, I built me then a theory rightly, in addition to the veins and nerves in our legs would probably also give specific lines for transport of cold feet to the bladder. (This sounds like an anecdote, but true!)
I have now successfully completed a degree in biology and I am pretty sure that no such lines exist. Therefore, I have my child's hypothesis revised: bladder infections occur when the lower part of cooling down the torso. This happens eg for light clothing.
given an experiment
subject A runs nice and warm in winter and is making a long barefoot walk in the woods. (NOTE: Frostbite can use from +5 ° C, not just exaggerating!)
subject B makes the same walk with free lower body, but with moon boots on the feet.
result
subject A reported that it was toasty warm. The feet are (at least for a few minutes) with blood so fantastic that it really fun to play. For the rest of the day it does not need socks and shoes more because the heat in the feet lasts a long time.
subject B reported nothing, because we have not done this part of the experiment, especially for health and aesthetic reasons. But we have sufficient grounds to suspect that it would be B and not A which would have captured the cystitis.
M.
Wedding Invite Pay Your Way
stamina than a horse
Without disturbing shoes we can (and re-learn) a movement technique that is so economical, that we can run endurance than horses.
use shoes with only a small proportion of available muscle groups - and the very uneconomical: No chance to keep up with a horse.
(Details: www.biokinematik.de, 24 KW 2005)
M.
Without disturbing shoes we can (and re-learn) a movement technique that is so economical, that we can run endurance than horses.
use shoes with only a small proportion of available muscle groups - and the very uneconomical: No chance to keep up with a horse.
(Details: www.biokinematik.de, 24 KW 2005)
M.
Wednesday, June 15, 2005
Error C0000005 In Gta Vice City
My back pain is away!
regularly and more and more since I run barefoot, I had no back pain. Without shoes, we use to walk more and different muscle groups. This has a positive effect on essential parts of the muscular system.
regularly and more and more since I run barefoot, I had no back pain. Without shoes, we use to walk more and different muscle groups. This has a positive effect on essential parts of the muscular system.
Filing Car Accident Report Calgary
dirt is not just dirt
course you get when you walk barefoot dirty feet. Most of it, however, can wash off with astonishing ease.
unpleasant exceptions: oil, tar, chewing gum is stuck - surprisingly it is the manmade substances, nerve requiring the BF. I call the "city dirt" - in Gegegensatz the "natural dirt" such as sand, earth, dust.
In the wild, just disgusting worm. Your mucus can be removed with mineral spirits.
M.
course you get when you walk barefoot dirty feet. Most of it, however, can wash off with astonishing ease.
unpleasant exceptions: oil, tar, chewing gum is stuck - surprisingly it is the manmade substances, nerve requiring the BF. I call the "city dirt" - in Gegegensatz the "natural dirt" such as sand, earth, dust.
In the wild, just disgusting worm. Your mucus can be removed with mineral spirits.
M.
Bus From Anthem To Phoenix
Can You Drink With Asacol
barefoot is more hygienic than wearing in shoes.
phone and PC keyboards have more bacteria than the much cited Bahnhofsklo.
why one hears still rare mushrooms by hand, while Athlete's foot is a common problem? (By the way, not with me, as some have suggested!)
Because the moist, warm atmosphere of the shoe ideal growing conditions for fungi represents.
also abound on our hands many different types of fungi, but they can not develop because they make each other an end and our hands are also drier and cooler than wrapped feet.
habit since I run barefoot, I feel dirty when I then but times must wear shoes.
given the brilliant quote:
"If you want to know why I run barefoot, but in the evening time you smell your socks!"
M.
phone and PC keyboards have more bacteria than the much cited Bahnhofsklo.
why one hears still rare mushrooms by hand, while Athlete's foot is a common problem? (By the way, not with me, as some have suggested!)
Because the moist, warm atmosphere of the shoe ideal growing conditions for fungi represents. also abound on our hands many different types of fungi, but they can not develop because they make each other an end and our hands are also drier and cooler than wrapped feet.
habit since I run barefoot, I feel dirty when I then but times must wear shoes.
given the brilliant quote:
"If you want to know why I run barefoot, but in the evening time you smell your socks!"
M.
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)