think how stupid for us to shoe manufacturers like when they try to convince us that the human foot is dependent on artificial support? In particular, manufacturers of sports shoes make us believe that running is harmful, if it does not happen in their disgustingly expensive products.
A few facts of human evolution: Homo sapiens is an animal of the savannah. As a biological species, we are long-distance runner. There are findings. There is no evidence that our tree-dwelling ancestors invented the shoes before they decide to transition to bipedal could. We are still barefoot endurance runner.
I do not know since when it boots (in the broadest sense) are, but in terms of evolution, they play no role. The wearing of shoes has to have no effect on our gene pool, because - considered phylogenetically - is too short a time before become fashionable.
If the shoe manufacturers argue that we "civilized" (oh, you shit) people but now once grew up with shoes, were therefore that our muscles, ligaments and bones so relaxed and our feet have become so sensitive that they - ontogenetically Viewed - now just need shoes, then I remember only one the analogy that we alcoholics should in future be administered instead of a cure even better, the daily dose of fuel, because they have become so used to it ...
It is very clear profit interests, which precludes walking barefoot. And since we live in a society that is in the profits of the ultimate yardstick for everything we have, I think, also just found a reason why barefoot is totally reasonable, and is still not practiced in a reasonable extent. (See in the article "realities created in the head")
M.
0 comments:
Post a Comment